Takeshi Yoshikawa

Background Deep learning may help to improve computer-aided detection of volume (CADv) measurement of pulmonary nodules at chest CT. Purpose To determine the efficacy of a deep learning method for improving CADv for measuring the solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) volumes of a nodule, doubling time (DT), and the change in volume at chest CT. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to December 2016, patients with pulmonary nodules at CT were retrospectively reviewed. CADv without and with a convolutional neural network (CNN) automatically determined total nodule volume change per day and DT. Area under the curves (AUCs) on a per-nodule basis and diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis were compared among all indexes from CADv with and without CNN for differentiating benign from malignant nodules. Results The CNN training set was 294 nodules in 217 patients, the validation set was 41 nodules in 32 validation patients, and the test set was 290 nodules in 188 patients. A total of 170 patients had 290 nodules (mean size ± standard deviation, 11 mm ± 5; range, 4-29 mm) diagnosed as 132 malignant nodules and 158 benign nodules. There were 132 solid nodules (46%), 106 part-solid nodules (36%), and 52 ground-glass nodules (18%). The test set results showed that the diagnostic performance of the CNN with CADv for total nodule volume change per day was larger than DT of CADv with CNN (AUC, 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.90, 0.96] vs 0.67 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.74]; P < .001) and CADv without CNN (total nodule volume change per day: AUC, 0.69 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.75]; P < .001; DT: AUC, 0.58 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.65]; P < .001). The accuracy of total nodule volume change per day of CADv with CNN was significantly higher than that of CADv without CNN (P < .001) and DT of both methods (P < .001). Conclusion Convolutional neural network is useful for improving accuracy of computer-aided detection of volume measurement and nodule differentiation capability at CT for patients with pulmonary nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the capability of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE) perfusion MR imaging with ultra-short TE and area-detector CT (ADCT), analyzed with the same mathematical methods, and that of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our institutional review board approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. A total 57 consecutive patients with 71 nodules prospectively underwent dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging with ultra-short TE, FDG-PET/CT, as well as microbacterial and/or pathological examinations. The nodules were classified into malignant nodules (n = 45) and benign nodules (n = 26). Pulmonary arterial, systemic arterial and total perfusions were determined by means of dual-input maximum slope models on ADCT and MR imaging and maximum values of standard uptake values (SUVmax) on PET/CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each index, and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Areas under the curve (Azs) of total perfusion on ADCT (Az = 0.89) and MR imaging (Az = 0.88) were significantly larger than those of systemic arterial perfusion and MR imaging (p<0.05). Accuracy of total perfusion on ADCT (87.3% [62/71]) and MR imaging (87.3% [62/71]) was significantly higher than that of systemic arterial perfusion for both methods (77.5% [55/71] p = 0.02) and SUVmax (78.9% [56/71], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Dynamic CE-perfusion MR imaging with ultra-short TE and ADCT and have similar potential capabilities, and are superior to FDG-PET/CT in this setting.

PURPOSE: To directly compare the utility for therapeutic outcome prediction of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE)-perfusion area-detector computed tomography (ADCT), MR imaging assessed with the same mathematical method and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive stage IIIB NSCLC patients, consisting of 25 males (mean age ± standard deviation: 66.6 ± 8.7 years) and 18 females (66.4 ± 8.2 years) underwent PET/CT, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging, chemoradiotherapy, and follow-up examination. In each patient, total, pulmonary arterial, and systemic arterial perfusions were calculated from both perfusion data and SUVmax on PET/CT, assessed for each targeted lesion, and averaged to determine final values. Receiver operating characteristics analyses were performed to compare the utility for distinguishing responders from non-responders using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Overall survival (OS) assessed with each index were compared between two groups by means of the Kaplan-Meier method followed by the log-rank test. RESULTS: Area under the curve (Az) for total perfusion on ADCT was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Az of total perfusion on MR imaging was significantly larger than that of pulmonary arterial perfusion (P < 0.05). Mean OS of responder and non-responder groups were significantly different for total and systemic arterial (P < 0.05) perfusion. CONCLUSION: Dynamic first-pass CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging as well as PET/CT are useful for early prediction of treatment response by NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI, coregistered FDG PET/MRI, integrated FDG PET/CT, and conventional imaging examination including bone scintigraphy, contrast-enhanced brain MRI, and CT for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) staging according to the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study subjects were 23 consecutively registered patients with MPM (15 men, eight women; mean age, 68 years for both sexes) who had prospectively undergone whole-body FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, conventional radiologic examination, surgical or conventional treatments, pathologic examination, and follow-up conventional imaging examinations between January 2011 and December 2017. TNM staging was evaluated by two independent readers. Kappa statistics and chi-square tests were used for evaluation agreements on each factor and clinical stage between each method and final diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of each method was statistically compared by use of McNemar test. RESULTS: The kappa values for each factor between each method and final diagnosis were significant (p < 0.0001) and ranged between 0.33 and 0.91. Kappa values between final diagnosis and stage evaluation were also significant (p < 0.0001) and ranged between 0.57 and 0.91. The diagnostic accuracy of N and stage assessment of whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of conventional imaging examination (N factor, p < 0.05; stage, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI, FDG PET/MRI, and FDG PET/CT for TNM stage assessment based on the new IASLC MPM staging system is greater than that of conventional imaging examination.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of different acquisition and reconstruction methods on the radiation dose and accuracy of CT number measurements, using a 320-detector row CT and a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) recommended phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions were performed on a 320-detector row CT, as 64- and 80-detector row helical and wide detector step-and-shoot (i.e., wide volume) acquisitions with tube currents of 400 mA, 100 mA, 50 mA, 20 mA, and 10 mA. Image was reconstructed with the filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing (AIDR 3D), and forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction (FIRST) methods. The difference between measured CT numbers and the actual -856HU value of the phantom insert was determined by each CT acquisition protocol. Differences in actual and measured CT numbers were compared among acquisitions and among reconstruction methods by means of Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The CT number obtained with 64-detector row helical acquisition was significantly larger than that obtained with others (p < 0.0001). At each tube current, the CT number reconstructed with FIRST was significantly smaller than that with others (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Acquisition and reconstruction methods are significantly affecting radiation dose reduction and accuracy of CT number measurements on a phantom study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to directly compare the capability of gadolinium-based blood volume (BV) mapping from MRI (BV-MRI) with ultrashort TE (UTE) with that of CT and perfusion SPECT in predicting the postoperative lung function of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI with UTE, thin-section CT, and perfusion SPECT examinations and measurements of the percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) before and after lung resection were performed for 29 patients with NSCLC (16 men [mean age, 66 years] and 13 women [mean age, 66 years]). BV-MRI with UTE was generated as a percentage of the signal change between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. The postoperative percentage of FEV1 was predicted from perfusion fractions derived from BV-MRI with UTE and from SPECT. Quantitatively and qualitatively predicted postoperative percentages of FEV1 from CT were calculated from the functional lung volumes and the number of segments. Each predicted postoperative percentage of FEV1 was then correlated with the actual postoperative percentage of FEV1, and the limits of agreement for each actual and predicted postoperative percentage of FEV1 were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Correlations between actual and predicted postoperative percentages of FEV1 for all methods were strong and significant (0.88 ≤ r ≤ 0.95). The limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 × SD) for BV-MRI with UTE (4.2% ± 6.5%) and quantitatively assessed CT (4.1% ± 6.5%) were smaller than those for qualitatively assessed CT (4.2% ± 9.8%) and perfusion SPECT (5.7% ± 8.7%). CONCLUSION: BV-MRI with UTE has the potential to predict the postoperative lung function of patients with NSCLC more accurately than qualitatively assessed CT and SPECT, and it can be considered to be at least as useful as quantitatively assessed CT.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrashort TE (UTE) MRI has been shown to deliver high-resolution images comparable to CT images. Here we evaluate the potential of UTE-MRI for precise lung nodule characterization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (mean [± SD] age, 68.7 ± 10.8 years) with 119 nodules or masses (mean size, 17.4 ± 16.3 mm; range, 4-88 mm) prospectively underwent CT (1-mm slice thickness) and UTE-MRI (TE, 192 μs; 1 mm3 resolution). Two radiologists assessed nodule dimensions and morphologic features (i.e., attenuation, margins, and internal lucencies), in consensus for CT and in a blinded fashion for UTE-MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated in reference to CT. RESULTS: Readers 1 and 2 underestimated the nodules' long axial diameter with UTEMRI by 1.2 ± 3.4 and 2.1 ± 4.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of UTE-MRI for subsolid attenuation were 95.9% and 70.3%, respectively, for reader 1 and 97.1% and 71.4%, respectively, for reader 2 (κ = 0.71 and 0.68). With regard to margin characteristics, for lobulation, sensitivity was 70.6% and 54.9%, and specificity was 93.2% and 96.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively; for spiculation, sensitivity was 61.5% and 48.0%, and specificity was 95.2% and 95.0%; and for pleural tags, sensitivity was 87.0% and 73.3%, and specificity was 93.8% and 95.0%. Finally, for internal lucencies, sensitivity was 72.7% and 61.3%, and specificity was 96.1% and 97.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively (κ = 0.64-0.81 for reader 1 and 0.48-0.72 for reader 2). Interreader agreement for attenuation, margin characteristics, and lucencies was substantial to almost perfect with few exceptions (κ = 0.51-0.90). CONCLUSION: UTE-MRI systematically underestimated dimension measurements by approximately 1-2 mm but otherwise showed high diagnostic properties and interreader agreement, yet unprecedented by MRI, for nodule morphologic assessment.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the interobserver agreements and diagnostic accuracies for IASLC/ITMIG (International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/International Thymic Malignancies Interest Group) thymic epithelial tumor staging of co-registered fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (FDG-PET/MRI), MRI, integrated fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and conventional imaging examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging, integrated PET/CTs, conventional imaging examinations, pathological examinations, and surgical reports, as well as follow-up examinations, were performed for 64 consecutive patients with thymic epithelial tumor. All FDG-PET/MRIs were co-registered PET data with MRI. TNM staging was evaluated by two radiologists on the basis of the IASLC/ITMIG thymic epithelial tumor staging system. Kappa statistics were determined for evaluations of agreements of all factors between each of the methods and final diagnosis. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of each factor and of determination of the clinical stage was statistically compared to each other using McNemar test. RESULTS: Agreements for all factors between each method and final diagnosis were assessed as fair, moderate, substantial, or almost perfect (0.28 ≤ kappa value ≤ 0.80; P < .0001). Diagnostic accuracy for N factor of PET/MRI (93.8% [60/64]) and MRI (93.8% [60/64]) was significantly higher than that of conventional imaging examination (81.3% [52/64] vs PET/MRI and MRI; P = .008). In addition, diagnostic accuracy for staging of PET/MRI (84.4% [54/64]) and MRI (84.4 [54/64]) was significantly higher than that of conventional imaging examination (71.9% [46/64] vs PET/MRI and MRI; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT have better interobserver agreements and accuracies than conventional imaging examination for the new IASLC/ITMIG thymic epithelial tumor staging.