水谷 泰嘉

OBJECTIVES: SMARCA4, a core component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, is frequently mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SMARCA4-deficient cancer cells are associated with increased replication stress, one of the major causes of genomic instability, which may lead to cancer. SMARCAD1, a chromatin remodeler, is known as replication fork progressor, and SMARCAD1 dysregulation is also closely related to cancer development. This study aimed to investigate the role of the SMARCA4-SMARCAD1 axis in the toleration of replication stress in NSCLC, focusing on the regulatory relationship between SMARCA4 and SMARCAD1 during replication stress conditions. METHODS: Human NSCLC cell lines (Calu-6, NCI-H1975, Calu-1, and NCI-H460) were used for experiments. SMARCA4 and SMARCAD1 expression levels were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Transcriptional regulation of SMARCAD1 was analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Immunofluorescent analysis was performed to assess SMARCAD1 accumulation at stalled replication forks. Clonogenic assays were conducted to evaluate the roles of SMARCA4 and SMARCAD1 in cell survival. RESULTS: SMARCAD1 was highly expressed in SMARCA4-depleted cells under replication stress. Immunofluorescent analysis revealed significant accumulation of SMARCAD1 at stalled replication forks in SMARCA4-depleted cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that SMARCA4 bound to the transcriptional regulatory region of SMARCAD1, and that this efficacy was decreased under replication stress, suggesting that SMARCA4 is a transcriptional suppressor of SMARCAD1. In a clonogenic analysis either SMARCA4 or SMARCAD1 is required for cell survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SMARCA4-SMARCAD1 axis is a novel mechanism that provides tolerance for replication stress.

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology leverages the molecular and genetic characteristics of tumors to enable accurate diagnosis and effective treatment selection. However, recent clinical trials have highlighted the limitations of current approaches and underscored the need to integrate static molecular profiling with functional analyses using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models-particularly for cancers such as head and neck cancer (HNC), where driver mutations are rare and prognosis remains poor. METHODS: Here, we aimed to establish a large-scale PDX library for HNC, termed the Fujita Xenograft Library (FXeL), annotated with detailed clinical information. Since 2022, tumor specimens from over 100 surgical cases at Fujita Health University Hospital have been transplanted into immunodeficient mice, resulting in the successful establishment of 62 PDX models. RESULTS: Advanced clinical stage was significantly associated with successful engraftment, and serial passaging led to progressively accelerated tumor growth. Comparative analyses of genomic profiles between patient tumors and PDXs demonstrated that major cancer-related mutations were largely preserved in PDXs, while clonal selection and evolution occurred during engraftment. Histopathological features, including keratinization and nuclear atypia, were retained, whereas stromal components such as cancer-associated fibroblasts exhibited compositional shifts. Furthermore, drug sensitivity assays revealed that PDX responses to cisplatin (CDDP) closely mirrored the clinical outcomes of the corresponding patients. CONCLUSIONS: The FXeL represents a robust and scalable platform for investigating HNC biology and therapeutic response. Despite limitations such as stromal remodeling and the absence of an immune microenvironment, these models provide valuable translational insights and support the advancement of functional precision oncology.

Objectives: Genetic risk models have substantially advanced our understanding of germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in some malignancies, whereas their clinical significance in lung cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to better understand potential contribution of GPVs to lung cancer etiology. Methods: A targeted sequencing panel of 143 cancer-related genes was applied to analyze 26 distinct lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) tumors from 11 patients histopathologically diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC). Tumor classification was performed through integrated evaluation of mutation profiles, and variants shared among tumor lesions were further validated as likely germline or somatic mutations using Sanger sequencing. Results: Mutation profiles were compared to reveal clonal relationships among lesions in each patient. Nine of the 11 cases (81.8%) were classified as MPLC, 1/11 (9.1%) as intrapulmonary metastasis (IM), and 1/11 (9.1%) exhibited features of both MPLC and IM. Among the nine MPLC cases, eight (88.9%) harbored matching variants across independent tumor lesions that were also detected in tumor-adjacent regions, suggesting classification as likely germline variants. Importantly, among the eight cases with shared variants, one possessed a novel truncating BRCA2 DNA repair associated (BRCA2) variant (p.N900IfsTer4), while the others harbored variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the tumor protein p53 (TP53), caspase recruitment domain family member 11 (CARD11), platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB), lysine methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D), phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 1 (PIK3R1), neuregulin 1 (NRG1), androgen receptor (AR), and KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) genes. To determine whether a similar BRCA2 variant was present in other lung cancer patients, 123 LUAD cases were analyzed, and one (0.81%) possessing a truncating BRCA2 variant (p.Q1429FfsTer20) without any typical driver mutations was identified. Conclusions: BRCA2 GPVs may represent putative pathogenic mutations, and thus be potential molecular targets for future treatment of LUAD.

CERS6 is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients through d18:1/C16:0 ceramide (C16 ceramide)-mediated cell migration, though the detailed mechanism has not been elucidated. In the present study, examinations including co-immunoprecipitation, liquid chromatography, and tandem mass spectrometry analysis were performed to identify a novel binding partner of CERS6. Among the examined candidates, LASP1 was a top-ranked binding partner, with the LIM domain possibly required for direct interaction. In accord with those findings, CERS6 and LASP1 were found to co-localize on lamellipodia in several lung cancer cell lines. Furthermore, silencing of CERS6 and/or LASP1 significantly suppressed cell migration and lamellipodia formation, whereas ectopic addition of C16 ceramide partially rescued those phenotypes. Both LASP1 and CERS6 showed co-immunoprecipitation with actin, with those interactions markedly reduced when the LASP1–CERS6 complex was abolished. Based on these findings, it is proposed that LASP1–CERS6 interaction promotes cancer cell migration.