hiroyuki kato

This study aimed to validate the DFS (direct fast scarlet) staining in the diagnosis of EC (eosinophilic colitis). The study included 50 patients with EC and 60 with control colons. Among the 60 control samples, 39 and 21 were collected from the ascending and descending colons, respectively. We compared the median number of eosinophils and frequency of eosinophil degranulation by HE (hematoxylin and eosin) and DFS staining between the EC and control groups. In the right hemi-colon, eosinophil count by HE was useful in distinguishing between EC and control (41.5 vs. 26.0 cells/HPF, p < 0.001), but the ideal cutoff value is 27.5 cells/HPF (high-power field). However, this method is not useful in the left hemi-colon (12.5 vs. 13.0 cells/HPF, p = 0.990). The presence of degranulation by DFS allows us to distinguish between the groups even in the left hemi-colon (58% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). DFS staining also enabled a more accurate determination of degranulation than HE. According to the current standard to diagnose EC (count by HE staining ≥20 cells/HPF), mucosal sampling from left hemi-colon is problematic since the number of eosinophils could not be increased even in EC. Determination of degranulated eosinophils by DFS may potentiate the diagnostic performance even in such conditions.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. METHODS: The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. RESULTS: A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). CONCLUSION: Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).