緒方 晴彦

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) is a novel biomarker for Crohn's disease (CD). The utility of combination use of LRG and C-reactive protein (CRP) has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of LRG in combination with CRP to predict endoscopic activity. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients with CD who had serum LRG concentrations measured at least once between June 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled. Clinical activity was evaluated with the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was used to analyse the correlations between the HBI, LRG concentrations and CRP concentrations. In patients undergoing ileocolonoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy within 60 days before or after LRG measurement, endoscopic activity was evaluated with the simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The diagnostic performance of LRG and CRP for endoscopic activity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-nine measurements in 343 patients were analysed. Although a strong correlation was found between LRG and CRP concentrations (rs = 0.75), the HBI did not well correlate with LRG or CRP concentrations. Endoscopic activity was analysed in 56 patients. In diagnosing endoscopically moderate to severe activity (SES-CD > 6), the area under the ROC curve of LRG was greater than that of CRP (0.74 vs. 0.63; p = .037). The optimal cut-off value estimated by Youden's index was 15.5 µg/mL for LRG, and 0.13 mg/dL for CRP. LRG and CRP concentrations were considered positive when they were above these cut-off values, and the sensitivity and specificity for an SES-CD > 6 were 58.3% and 93.8%, respectively. Dual positivity of LRG and CRP showed the highest specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Combination use of dual positive LRG and CRP is useful for diagnosing endoscopically moderate to severe disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of several biologics for ulcerative colitis (UC), there remains a critical need to identify first-line treatment biologics. The superiority of infliximab (IFX) over vedolizumab (VED) and ustekinumab (UST) was evaluated as initial UC treatments in patients with biologic-naïve UC. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized control trial was conducted across 20 Japanese medical institutions. An independent center randomly allocated patients with UC (Mayo score ≥ 6) who had not previously used biologics to three treatment groups (IFX, VED, UST). The primary endpoint was the clinical remission (CR) rate at week 12, with other endpoints including the treatment continuation rate at week 26 and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: From May 2021 to June 2023, 107 cases were registered, including 104 for safety and 97 for efficacy evaluation. CR rate at week 12 was 36.4% (95%CI:20.4-54.9), 32.4% (95%CI:17.4-50.5) and 43.3% (95%CI:25.5-62.6) in IFX, VED, and UST group, respectively. Continuation rates at week 26 were 50.0%(IFX), 58.3% (VED), and 82.4% (UST). AEs related to study medication were 14.7% (IFX), 16.7% (VED), and 5.9% (UST). Predictors for CR at week 12 were thiopurine use in IFX (p = 0.04), lower baseline Mayo score (p = 0.007), and lower Patient report outcome 2 (p = 0.003) at week 2 in VED. CONCLUSION: Due to small sample size, it is challenging to make conclusions for main endpoints from this study while our study suggested that use of thiopurines in IFX group and lower activity at enrollment in VED group may enhance treatment efficacy. (jRCT1031200329; available at https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic healing is generally defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≤1 in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, patients with an MES of 1 are at higher relapse risk than those with an MES of 0. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of proactive dose escalation of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in UC patients with an MES of 1. METHODS: An open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 hospitals between 2018 and 2022. Ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission under oral 5-ASA therapy and diagnosed as having an MES of 1 were enrolled. Patients receiving maintenance therapy other than 5-ASA and immunomodulator were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a dose-escalated (intervention) or constant dose (control) of 5-ASA. Concomitant immunomodulator was used as the stratification factor in the randomization. The primary end point was relapse within 1 year. The subgroup analysis was stratified for the use of immunomodulators. RESULTS: The full analysis set included 79 patients (39 intervention and 40 control). Immunomodulators were used in 20 (25.3%) patients. Relapse was less in the intervention group (15.4%) than the control group (37.5%; P = .026). In the subgroup with concomitant immunomodulators, relapse was also less in the intervention group (10.0%) than the control group (70.0%; P = .020). In patients without immunomodulators, the difference was not significant between 2 groups (intervention, 17.2%; control, 26.7%; P = .53). CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation of 5-ASA reduced relapse within 1 year in UC patients in clinical remission with an MES of 1.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the use of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), compare cases of overt and occult OGIB, assess the rates of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) interventions and rebleeding, and identify predictive markers of positive VCE findings. METHODS: Medical records of 430 patients who underwent VCE for OGIB between 2004 and 2022 were analyzed. Occult OGIB was defined as IDA or positive fecal occult blood, whereas overt OGIB was defined as clinically imperceptible bleeding. We retrospectively analyzed demographics, VCE findings based on Saurin classification (P0, P1, and P2), outcome of BAE interventions, and rebleeding rates. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients with overt OGIB and 177 with occult OGIB were included. P1 findings were predominant in both groups, with a similar distribution. The percentage of patients receiving conservative therapy was higher in P1 than in P2 for both overt and occult OGIB. BAE was more frequently performed in P2 than in P1 VCE (83.0% vs. 35.3% in overt OGIB, 84.4% vs. 24.4% in occult OGIB). The percentage of positive findings and intervention in total BAE performed patients were comparable in P1 and P2 of overt OGIB, whereas these percentages in P2 were more than P1 of occult OGIB. CONCLUSION: VCE effectively identified OGIB lesions requiring intervention, particularly occult OGIB lesions, potentially reducing unnecessary BAE. Rebleeding rates varied according to the VCE findings, emphasizing the importance of follow-up in high-risk patients.