佐藤 大介

Abstract Onychomycosis, a fungal nail infection, is a common dermatological condition in Japan, with a prevalence of approximately 5%–10%. Despite the introduction of new antifungal medications and updated treatment guidelines published in 2019, data on real‐world prescription trends and the associated medical costs are limited. This study aimed to investigate the prescription patterns and medical costs of topical and oral antifungal medications for onychomycosis in Japan from fiscal years 2014 to 2021 using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan Open Data. We analyzed the annual prescription volumes and medical costs of four antifungal medications: efinaconazole, luliconazole, fosravuconazole, and terbinafine. The prescription volume of efinaconazole, a topical medication launched in 2014, rapidly increased and dominated the market share. Fosravuconazole, an oral medication introduced in 2018, showed an increasing trend, coinciding with a decline in efinaconazole prescriptions. Terbinafine, a well‐established oral medication, experienced a substantial decrease in prescription volume. The sex‐ and age‐adjusted prescription volume per 100 000 population was higher among older adults, particularly for efinaconazole. The total medical costs for onychomycosis treatment more than doubled in fiscal year 2015 compared with that for 2014, mainly driven by efinaconazole prescriptions, and exceeded 30 billion Japanese yen in fiscal years 2019–2021. The costs slightly decreased in fiscal years 2020 and 2021, possibly due to the introduction of fosravuconazole. The predominance of topical prescriptions, especially in older adults, raises concerns regarding adherence to the Japanese guidelines that recommend oral antifungals as the first‐line treatment for onychomycosis. The substantial increase in medical costs also highlights the economic burden of onychomycosis and the need for cost‐effective treatment strategies. This study provides valuable insights into the real‐world prescription trends and medical costs of onychomycosis treatment in Japan, suggesting an opportunity to assess potential gaps between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

Abstract Background and Aim Changes in the number of surgeries for gastric cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have been reported, but data are insufficient to understand the impact at the national level. This study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on gastric surgery in Japan. Methods Insurance claims data registered from January 2015 to January 2021 were used. Changes in the number of endoscopic resections and gastrectomies for gastric cancer were estimated using an interrupted time‐series analysis. Results The number of endoscopic resections significantly decreased in July 2020 (−1565; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2022, −1108) and January 2021 (−539; 95% CI: −970, −109), and the number of laparoscopic surgeries significantly decreased in July 2020 (−795; 95% CI: −1097, −492), October 2020 (−313; 95% CI: −606, −19), and January 2021 (−507; 95% CI: −935, −78). Meanwhile, the number of open gastrectomies remained unchanged, and the number of robot‐assisted gastrectomies steadily increased since their coverage by public health insurance in April 2018. Conclusions The decreased number of endoscopic resections and laparoscopic surgeries in Japan suggests a decline in early‐stage gastric cancer diagnosis, likely due to the suspension of gastric cancer screening and diagnostic testing during the pandemic. Meanwhile, the number of open and robot‐assisted gastrectomies remained unchanged and increased, respectively, indicating that these applications were not affected by the pandemic‐related medical crisis. These findings highlight that procedures for cancer diagnosis, including screening, should still be provided during pandemics.

Abstract Various countries have reported a decrease in breast cancer surgeries during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, inconsistent results have been reported in Japan. This study revealed changes in the number of surgeries during the pandemic using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) from January 2015 to January 2021, where insurance claims data from Japan as a whole are comprehensively accumulated. The number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) significantly decreased in July (− 846; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 1190 to − 502) and October 2020 (− 540; 95% CI − 861 to − 218). No decrease was observed for other types of surgery, BCS with ALND, and mastectomy with or without ALND. In the age-specific subgroup analysis, significant and transient reduction in BCS without ALND was observed in all age groups (0–49, 50–69, and ≥ 70 years). The number of BCS without ALND significantly decreased for a relatively short period in the early pandemic stages, suggesting reduced surgery for patients with a relatively low stage of cancer. Some patients with breast cancer might have been left untreated during the pandemic, and an unfavorable prognosis would be a concern.

Background Introducing telemedicine in outpatient treatment may improve patient satisfaction and convenience. However, the optimal in-person visit interval for video-based telemedicine among patients with hypertension remains unreported in Japan. Objective We determined the optimal in-person visit interval for video-based telemedicine among patients with hypertension. Methods This was a cluster randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The target sites were 8 clinics in Japan that had a telemedicine system, and the target patients were individuals with essential hypertension. Among patients receiving video-based telemedicine, those who underwent in-person visits at 6-month intervals were included in the intervention group, and those who underwent in-person visits at 3-month intervals were included in the control group. The follow-up period of the participants was 6 months. The primary end point of the study was the change in systolic blood pressure, and the secondary end points were the rate of treatment continuation after 6 months, patient satisfaction, health economic evaluation, and safety evaluation. Results Overall, 64 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 54.5 (SD 10.3) years, and 60.9% (39/64) of patients were male. For the primary end point, the odds ratio for the estimated difference in the change in systolic blood pressure between the 2 groups was 1.18 (90% CI –3.68 to 6.04). Notably, the criteria for noninferiority were met. Patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Furthermore, the indirect costs indicated that lost productivity was significantly lesser in the intervention group than in the control group. Moreover, the treatment continuation rate did not differ between the intervention and control groups, and there were no adverse events in either group. Conclusions Blood pressure control status and safety did not differ between the intervention and control groups. In-person visits at 6-month intervals may cause a societal cost reduction and improve patient satisfaction during video-based telemedicine. Trial Registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000040953; https://tinyurl.com/2p8devm9

OBJECTIVES: New versions of balloon-expandable and self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been developed, but few studies have examined the outcomes associated with these devices using national-level data. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical and economic outcomes of TAVR for aortic stenosis in Japan through an analysis of real-world data. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed using data from patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR with Edwards SAPIEN 3, Medtronic CoreValve, or Medtronic Evolut R valves throughout Japan from April 2016 to March 2018. Pacemaker implantation, mortality, and health expenditure were examined for each valve type during hospitalization and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Generalized linear regression models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between the valve types and outcomes. RESULTS: We analyzed 7244 TAVR cases (SAPIEN 3: 5276, CoreValve: 418, and Evolut R: 1550) across 145 hospitals. The adjusted 1-year expenditures for SAPIEN 3, CoreValve, and Evolut R were $79 402, $76 125, and $75 527, respectively; SAPIEN 3 was significantly more expensive than the other valves (P < .05). The pacemaker implantation hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were significantly higher (P < .001) than SAPIEN 3 at 2.61 (2.07-3.27) and 1.80 (1.53-2.12), respectively. The mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CoreValve and Evolut R were not significant at 1.11 (0.84-1.46) and 1.22 (0.97-1.54), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SAPIEN 3 users had generally lower pacemaker implantation and mortality but higher expenditures than CoreValve and Evolut R users.

<title>Abstract</title> The number of orthopedic surgeries is increasing as populations steadily age, but surgical site infection (SSI) rates remain relatively consistent. This study aimed to quantify the healthcare resources attributable to methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (MRSA) SSIs in orthopedic surgical patients. The analysis was conducted using a national claims database comprising data from almost all Japanese residents. We examined patients who underwent any of the following surgeries between April 2012 and March 2018: amputation (AMP), spinal fusion (FUSN), open reduction of fracture (FX), hip prosthesis (HPRO), knee prosthesis (KPRO), and laminectomy (LAM). Propensity score matching was performed to identify non-SSI control patients, and generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the differences in outcomes between the case and control groups. The numbers of MRSA SSI cases (infection rates) ranged from 64 (0.03%) to 1,152 (2.33%). MRSA SSI-attributable increases in healthcare expenditure ranged from $11,630 ($21,151 vs. $9,521) for LAM to $35,693 ($50,122 vs. $14,429) for FX, and increases in hospital stay ranged from 40.6 days (59.2 vs. 18.6) for LAM to 89.5 days (122.0 vs. 32.5) for FX. In conclusion, MRSA SSIs contribute to substantial increases in healthcare resource utilization, emphasizing the need to implement effective infection prevention measures for orthopedic surgeries.

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is associated with a heavy burden on the mental and physical health of patients, regional healthcare resources, and global economic activity. Many patients with lung cancer are thought to be affected by this situation. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on lung cancer treatment scheduling. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of lung cancer patients who were undergoing anticancer treatment at the National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center (600 beds) in Kyoto, Japan, between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2020. After the medical records were reviewed, the patients were assigned to one of two groups, depending on whether their lung cancer treatment schedule was delayed. We assessed the characteristics, types of histopathology and treatment, and the reason for the delay. A total 15 (9.1%) patients experienced a delay in lung cancer treatment during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Patients with a treatment delay received significantly more immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy than patients without a treatment delay (P = 0.0057). On the contrary, no patients receiving molecular targeted agents experienced a treatment delay during the COVID‐19 pandemic period (P = 0.0027). The treatments of most of the patients were delayed at their request. We determined that 9.1% lung cancer patients suffered anxiety and requested a treatment delay during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Oncologists should bear in mind that patients with cancer have more anxiety than expected under unprecedented circumstances such as the COVID‐19 pandemic.

<sec><title>Introduction</title> Studies have demonstrated the high agreement of several remote neuropsychological tests using video teleconferencing (VTC) with face-to-face (FTF) tests. However, the reliability of the remotely administered Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), one of the most commonly used neuropsychological tests to detect cognitive decline, has not been substantially elucidated, particularly in Japanese populations. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the remotely administered ADAS-cog compared with FTF-administered ADAS-cog among elderly Japanese participants. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> Participants aged ≥60 years with and without cognitive impairment, i.e. those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), those with dementia and healthy controls (HCs), were assessed with the ADAS-cog using VTC and FTF testing at an interval of &gt;2 weeks and &lt;3 months. The assessment order (VTC or FTF) was randomized by participants. Participants’ scores were compared among the entire sample, as well as subgroups, using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) in a mixed-effects model. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> A total of 73 participants were included in the study (36 men; age, 76.3 ± 7.6 years). The ICC for the ADAS-cog total score was high in the entire sample (0.86), whereas ICCs were moderate to high for the subgroups (MCI: 0.63, dementia: 0.80 and HC: 0.74). </sec><sec><title>Discussion</title> The results indicate that a VTC-administered ADAS-cog could be an alternative for an FTF-administered ADAS-cog, although further replication studies with larger sample sizes and a wider range of cognitive functionalities are warranted. </sec>

<title>Abstract</title> <sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Flow diverters (FDs) have marked the beginning of innovations in the endovascular treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms, but no multi-institutional studies have been conducted on these devices from both the clinical and economic perspectives. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To compare retreatment rates and healthcare expenditures between FDs and conventional coiling-based treatments in all eligible cases in Japan. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We identified patients who had undergone endovascular treatments during the study period (October 2015-March 2018) from a national-level claims database. The outcome measures were retreatment rates and 1-yr total healthcare expenditures, which were compared among patients who had undergone FD, coiling, and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) treatments. The coiling and SAC groups were further categorized according to the number of coils used. Retreatment rates were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, and total expenditures were analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear models. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The study sample comprised 512 FD patients, 1499 coiling patients, and 711 SAC patients. The coiling groups with ≥10 coils and ≥9 coils had significantly higher retreatment rates than the FD group with hazard ratios of 2.75 (1.30-5.82) and 2.52 (1.24-5.09), respectively. In addition, the coiling group with ≥10 coils and SAC group with ≥10 coils had significantly higher 1-year expenditures than the FD group with cost ratios (95% CI) of 1.30 (1.13-1.49) and 1.31 (1.15-1.50), respectively. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSION</title> In this national-level study, FDs demonstrated significantly lower retreatment rates and total expenditures than conventional coiling with ≥ 9 coils. </sec>

Background: In an aging society, neuropsychological testing using video teleconferencing (VTC) is increasingly important. Despite the potential benefit of a VTC-administered Montreal Cognitive Assessment Tool (MoCA) to detect cognitive decline, only a limited number of studies have investigated this tool's reliability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of VTC-administered MoCA compared with face-to-face (FTF)-administered MoCA among elderly Japanese participants. Moreover, we examined participants' satisfaction with VTC-administered MoCA. Methods: Participants ≥60 years of age with and without cognitive impairment (i.e., those with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], those with dementia, and healthy controls [HC]) were assessed with VTC- and FTF-administered MoCA at an interval of >2 weeks and <3 months. The order effect (VTC first vs. FTF first) and time effect (first vs. second testing session), as well as several covariates such as age and years of education were controlled. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated using a mixed-effects model to assess the agreement between the two (VTC- vs. FTF-administered) groups. Participants' satisfaction with VTC-administered MoCA was examined using a Likert scale asking seven questions. Results: We included 73 participants in the study (36 men; age, 76.3 ± 7.5 years). The ICC for the MoCA total score was high in the entire sample (0.85), whereas ICCs were moderate to high for the subgroups (MCI: 0.82, dementia: 0.82, and HC: 0.53). Furthermore, we found good overall participant satisfaction with VTC-administered MoCA. Discussion: VTC-administered MoCA appears viable as an alternative to FTF-administered MoCA, although further replication studies with larger sample sizes are needed.