上原 信太郎

We aimed to evaluate the applicability of a newly developed joint angle measurement system comprising six-axis inertial measurement unit sensors and tablet-based application for estimating joint angles from angular velocity and acceleration data. The application calculated orientation angles from single sensor data, with relative angles calculated using multiple sensors. In experiment 1, validity and reliability were examined using a test device. In experiment 2, static angles of five joints were calculated in four healthy participants using attached sensors and compared with universal goniometer values. In experiment 3, usability and satisfaction were evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)-like scale. In experiment 1, mean difference and root mean squared error (RMSE) between the developed system and test device were < 0.2° and < 1.0°, respectively, across all axes. In experiment 2, when data from all joints were pooled, mean difference and RMSE were 0.2° and 3.8°, respectively. Mean difference and RMSE across each joint were < 5°, indicating the system is comparable to universal goniometer. In experiment 3, median SUS and QUEST-like scores were 73.8 and 4.0, respectively, indicating good usability and satisfaction. The developed system has high accuracy and sufficient validity for human joint angles, with good usability and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the time course of longitudinal changes in the independence level of toileting-related subtasks in post-stroke patients. DESIGN: Single-institution, prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: A total of 101 consecutive patients with stroke admitted to subacute rehabilitation wards who urinated/defecated in bathrooms using wheelchairs upon admission. METHODS: Occupational therapists assessed the independence level of patients in each of the 24 toileting subtasks on a 3-level rating scale using the Toileting Tasks Assessment Form every 2-4 weeks from admission to the endpoint (achieving independent toileting or discharge). Patients were classified based on admission and endpoint assessment form scores using a two-step cluster analysis. RESULTS: Patients were classified into Cluster 1 (30 patients who exhibited a greater independence level in all subtasks upon admission [46.7-100% of patients performed each subtask independently] to the endpoint [73.3-100%]), Cluster 2 (41 patients who showed less independence upon admission [0-26.8%] but gained greater independence at the endpoint [34.1-73.2%]), and Cluster 3 (30 patients whose independence levels remained low in many subtasks from admission [0-26.7%] to the endpoint [3.3-26.7%]). CONCLUSION: Changes in toileting independence levels could be classified into 3 time courses. Effective intervention strategies may differ between each group.