Teiji Kuzuya

The new Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of IPMN. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a diagnostic modality with a high spatial resolution that allows detailed observation and obtaining cyst fluid or tissue samples via EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Currently, EUS is an indispensable examination method for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. On the other hand, there have been concerns that EUS imaging tends to be highly operator-dependent, and may lack objectivity. Previous guidelines have assigned EUS as an option for patients with worrisome features. However, recent reports indicate that the sensitivity of EUS for the diagnosis of mural nodules (MNs) is more than 90%, comparable or superior to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The specific advantages of EUS in the diagnosis of IPMN are: (1) high spatial resolution imaging for the diagnosis of MNs, (2) contrast-enhanced EUS for differentiation of intra-cystic MNs from mucous clots, and (3) pathological diagnosis using EUS-FNA and differential diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumor by cystic fluid analysis. In order to utilize EUS in the diagnosis of IPMN, endoscopists are required to have the skills to provide sufficiently objective imaging findings.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is recommended as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). A subgroup analysis of the IMbrave150 trial showed shorter overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients with stable disease (SD) than patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Improving OS in patients with SD is an unmet medical need. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) may enhance treatment efficacy by controlling intrahepatic lesions and activating anti-tumor immunity. The IMPACT study aims to evaluate whether combining atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with TACE improves OS in patients with SD. METHODS: IMPACT is a multicenter, phase 3 study being conducted in Japan, recruiting uHCC patients aged ≥ 18 years with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A (single tumor ≥ 5 cm only, TACE unsuitable), stage B (TACE unsuitable) or stage C (excluding Vp3 or 4), Child-Pugh A liver function, and no prior systemic therapy. After 12 weeks of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment as induction therapy, patients are being divided into two cohorts based on response: a randomized cohort for patients who achieve SD, or an atezolizumab plus bevacizumab followed by curative conversion (ABC-conversion) cohort for patients who achieve CR or PR. Patients in the randomized cohort are receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and intrahepatic control TACE (Group A), or continuing atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Group B). Patients in the ABC-conversion cohort are receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. All cohorts can be considered for curative conversion therapies for residual tumors if these therapies are considered curative, in the patient's best interests, and deemed necessary by the investigator. The primary endpoint is OS for the randomized cohort and conversion rate for the ABC-conversion cohort. Secondary endpoints in both cohorts include progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, time to CR, and safety. The study is expected to last 6.5 years from June 2023. DISCUSSION: IMPACT is evaluating the efficacy of combination therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and TACE, as well as exploring the efficacy of curative conversion therapy. The results should contribute to establishing a response-guided treatment strategy for uHCC by determining optimal treatment according to the therapeutic effect of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT), identifier: jRCTs051230037. Registered 13 June 2023. PROTOCOL VERSION: 8 May 2024; version 1.4.

AIM: To investigate the characteristics and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) who achieved a complete response (CR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). METHODS: A total of 120 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 and Child-Pugh A at the start of Atz/Bev treatment were included. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was recorded in 59 patients. RESULTS: The CR rate with Atz/Bev alone was 15.0%. The median time to CR was 3.4 months, and the median duration of CR was 15.6 months. A significant factor associated with achieving CR with Atz/Bev alone was an AFP ratio of 0.34 or less at 3 weeks. Adding transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the six patients who achieved a partial response increased the overall CR rate to 20%. Among the 24 patients who achieved CR, the median progression-free survival was 19.3 months, the median overall survival was not reached, and 14 patients (58.3%) were able to discontinue Atz/Bev and achieve a drug-free status. Twelve of these patients developed progressive disease (PD), but eleven successfully received post-PD treatments and responded well. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving CR by mRECIST using Atz/Bev alone or with additional TACE can be expected to offer an extremely favorable prognosis.

Introduction. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide.Gap statement. Monitoring of HCC and predicting its immunotherapy responses are challenging.Aim. This study explored the potential of the gut microbiome for HCC monitoring and predicting HCC immunotherapy responses.Methods. DNA samples were collected from the faeces of 22 patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) and 85 healthy controls. The gut microbiome was analysed using 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing and quantitative PCR (qPCR).Results. The microbiomes of patients with HCC demonstrated significant enrichment of Lactobacillus, particularly Lactobacillus fermentum, and Streptococcus, notably Streptococcus anginosus. Comparative analysis between Atz/Bev responders (R) and non-responders (NR) revealed a higher abundance of Bacteroides stercoris in the NR group and Bacteroides coprocola in the R group. Using qPCR analysis, we observed elevated levels of S. anginosus and reduced levels of 5α-reductase genes, essential for the synthesis of isoallolithocholic acid, in HCC patients compared to controls. Additionally, the analysis confirmed a significantly lower abundance of B. stercoris in the Atz/Bev R group relative to the NR group.Conclusions. The gut microbiome analysis and specific gene quantification via qPCR could provide a rapid, less invasive, and cost-effective approach for assessing the increased risk of HCC, monitoring patient status, and predicting immunotherapy responses.

Less than half of all patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) respond to chemotherapy, and the prognosis of PDAC is poor, which may be mediated by the gut microbiota. We investigated the clinical improvement effects of 1-kestose, a fructooligosaccharide, on PDAC chemotherapy in this single-center, randomized, controlled pilot trial conducted at Fujita Health University Hospital, which enrolled patients with PDAC. The trial included 1-kestose administration and non-administration groups. The 1-kestose group received 9 g of 1-kestose daily for 12 weeks, and their blood markers, imaging studies, physical findings, and gut microbiota were evaluated. In the 1-kestose administration group, the cancer marker CA19-9 significantly decreased, and there was a reduction in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). There was also suppression of the reduction of albumin levels and of an increase in C-reactive protein. Additionally, Escherichia coli, which typically increases in PDAC, significantly decreased in the 1-kestose group. Thus, 1-kestose altered the gut microbiota and improved the prognostic factors for PDAC. Large-scale, long-term trials of 1-kestose interventions for PDAC are thus warranted to improve the prognosis of PDAC.

The relationship between antitumor response and tumor marker changes was evaluated in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre). Forty patients were enrolled in this retrospective evaluation of treatment outcomes. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1 at 8 weeks, the objective response (OR) rate was 25% and the disease control (DC) rate was 57.5%. The median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ratio at 4 weeks was 0.39 in patients who achieved OR at 8 weeks (8W-OR group), significantly lower than the 1.08 in the non-8W-OR group (p = 0.0068); however, it was 1.22 in patients who did not achieve DC at 8 weeks (non-8W-DC group), significantly higher than the 0.53 in the 8W-DC group (p = 0.0006). Similarly, the median des-γ-carboxy-prothrombin (DCP) ratio at 4 weeks was 0.15 in the 8W-OR group, significantly lower than the 1.46 in the non-8W-OR group (p < 0.0001); however, it was 1.23 in the non-8W-DC group, significantly higher than the 0.49 in the 8W-DC group (p = 0.0215). Early changes in tumor markers after Dur/Tre initiation were associated with antitumor response. In particular, changes in AFP and DCP at 4 weeks may offer useful biomarkers for early prediction of both response and progressive disease following Dur/Tre.

This study aimed to complement the results of the REACH-2 study by prospectively evaluating the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a real-world setting. This was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter, prospective study conducted at 13 institutions in Japan (jRCTs031190236). The study included Child-Pugh Class A patients with advanced HCC who had received pretreatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) or lenvatinib. Ramucirumab was introduced as a second-line treatment after Atez/Bev or lenvatinib and as a third-line treatment after Atez/Bev and lenvatinib. Between May 2020 and July 2022, we enrolled 19 patients, including 17 who received ramucirumab. Additionally, seven patients received lenvatinib, another seven patients received Atez/Bev, and three patients received Atez/Bev followed by lenvatinib as prior treatment. The primary endpoint was a 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, which was 14.3%. The median PFS and overall survival were 3.7 and 12.0 months, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (23.5%), proteinuria (17.6%), and neutropenia (11.8%). The discontinuation rate due to AEs was 29.4%. Six patients progressed from Child-Pugh A to B after treatment with ramucirumab. Thirteen patients were eligible for post-ramucirumab treatment, including systemic therapy. Despite the limited number of patients, the efficacy of ramucirumab was comparable to that observed in the REACH-2 study when used after lenvatinib and Atez/Bev. However, the incidence of AEs was higher than that in the REACH-2 study.

INTRODUCTION: When we administer atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, we often encounter inconsistent results between the qualitative dipstick urinalysis and the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR)measurements. In this study, we investigated the relationship between qualitative dipstick urinalysis and UPCR in these patients, and assessed whether incorporating UPCR into the testing protocol could prevent unnecessary interruptions during bevacizumab treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 298 urine samples collected from 61 patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our institution between October 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. We used UPCR as an alternative test to the 24-hour urine protein and set the discontinuation criteria for bevacizumab at a UPCR of 2.0 or higher. RESULTS: Among the 41 samples that tested positive for 2+ on the dipstick test, only one(2.4%)had a UPCR exceeding 2.0. Additionally, among the 44 samples that showed a 3+ result, 24 samples(54.5%)had a UPCR higher than 2.0. If our decision to discontinue bevacizumab had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 2+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in 97.6%(40/41)of the cases. Even if the decision had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 3+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in almost half of the cases(45.5%, 20/44). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the addition of UPCR to the qualitative dipstick urinalysis during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could help prevent unnecessary interruptions of bevacizumab and offer more clinical benefits in real-world practice, compared to using qualitative dipstick urinalysis alone.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides high spatial resolution and more detailed images than other diagnostic modalities. Furthermore, EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), such as EUS-guided fine needle aspiration or biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB), is an indispensable tool in pancreaticobiliary disease diagnostics, supporting a conclusive pathological diagnosis. In this review, we evaluate the current status and the usefulness of EUS-TA for the diagnostics of the following biliary tract diseases: (A) biliary stricture diagnostics, (B) biliary tract cancer (BTC) itself, and (C) staging of advanced BTC. Previous reports have shown that EUS-FNA for biliary lesions is a safe procedure that is useful in differentiating biliary cancer from benign lesions and in the staging of BTC. On the other hand, the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA for bile duct lesions is reported to be similar to that of transpapillary biopsy. Overall, EUS-TA for biliary lesions may be a safe and effective method, but it should be performed with an understanding of the risk of serious adverse events such as bile leakage and peritoneal dissemination of cancer. It is recommended for distal biliary stricture lesions for which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannot confirm the diagnosis or gallbladder lesions if they do not require the needle to pass through the biliary lumen.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides high spatial and contrast resolution and is a useful tool for evaluating the pancreato-biliary regions. Recently, contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) has been used to evaluate lesion vascularity, especially for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. CH-EUS adds two major advantages when diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL). First, it can differentiate between mural nodules and mucous clots, thereby improving the accurate classification of PCL. Second, it helps with evaluation of the malignant potential of PCL, especially of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by revealing the vascularity in the mural nodules and solid components. This review discusses the use and limitations of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PCL.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) has become widely used as a first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, for post-Atz/Bev therapy, evidence on the outcomes of molecular targeted agents, such as lenvatinib, is limited. The present study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of lenvatinib on advanced HCC in patients who had previously undergone Atz/Bev treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with HCC, who received lenvatinib after Atz/Bev treatment, were enrolled in the study. In particular, we examined the impact of adverse events (AEs), such as anorexia and general fatigue. During the treatment, lenvatinib dosages were adjusted or temporarily discontinued in response to AEs. Treatment outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for lenvatinib treatment were 25.0% and 95.0%, respectively, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months. Eleven patients experienced anorexia or fatigue, leading to a reduction in the dose of lenvatinib but not to a significant difference in the time to drug discontinuation. Importantly, there were no significant differences between the 11 anorexia/fatigue-suffering patients and the nine other patients with regard to PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib can be efficacious and safe for treating advanced HCC patients previously treated with Atz/Bev, and AEs such as anorexia and general fatigue can be effectively managed without losing lenvatinib's therapeutic benefits.

Ramucirumab was approved in June 2019 in Japan for the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)with serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL, whose disease had worsened following chemotherapy. According to the Japan Society of Hepatology clinical practice guidelines for HCC revised in 2021, treatment with ramucirumab is recommended as second-line or subsequent systemic therapy for patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function and serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL who have discontinued treatment with sorafenib because of radiologic progression or adverse events. To assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with ramucirumab in Japanese clinical practice for patients with unresectable advanced HCC, we reviewed evidence from original articles published after 2019, when ramucirumab was approved as a treatment for HCC in Japan. In addition, we evaluated a pooled data analysis of 2 global phase 3 studies(REACH and REACH-2), in which ramucirumab was administered as second-line therapy after the treatment of sorafenib in patients with unresectable advanced HCC, and the results of the REACH-2 expansion cohort of patients who received ramucirumab after systemic therapy other than sorafenib.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare tumor composed of myofibroblasts with inflammatory blood cell infiltration. It commonly occurs in the lungs and rarely in the esophagus. We herein report a valuable case of IMT originating in the esophagus. A 60-year-old Japanese woman with dysphagia had a large subepithelial lesion (SEL) in the cervical esophagus, which was 15 cm in length. Surgical resection was performed to confirm the pathological diagnosis and improve the symptoms. The postoperative diagnosis was IMT composed of multiple nodules. There was no recurrence or metastasis within one year after surgery.

The diagnosis of bile duct tumors can be difficult at times. A transpapillary bile duct biopsy findings with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sometimes contradict diagnostic imaging findings. In bile duct tumors, inflammatory polyps in the extrahepatic bile duct are relatively rare with extrahepatic cholangitis. The disease's clinical relevance, including its natural history and prognosis, is not always clear. We show here a rare case of an inflammatory polyp in the common bile duct. A 69-year-old woman with abdominal pain was diagnosed with cholangitis. The findings of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography suggested that she had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The examination and therapy of cholangitis were performed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The cholangiography revealed a suspected tumor in the hilar bile duct with some common bile duct stones. Then, after endoscopic sphincterotomy to remove tiny common bile duct stones, further detailed examinations were performed at the same time using an oral cholangioscope revealed a papillary raised lesion with a somewhat white surface in the bile duct; a biopsy was conducted on the same spot, and epithelial cells with mild atypia appeared in the shape of a papilla. Since the malignant tumor or the intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct could not be ruled out, extrahepatic bile duct resection was conducted with the patient's informed consent. Bile duct inflammatory polyp was the histopathological diagnosis.

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib, in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Of 34 patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, a total of 23, including 16 with lenvatinib failure, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The adverse events, changes in liver function and antitumor responses at 6 weeks after starting therapy were evaluated. Results: The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was low, at 13.0%. Albumin–bilirubin scores did not worsen at 3 and 6 weeks compared to baseline. The objective response rate and disease control rate at 6 weeks were 17.4% and 78.3% according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and 30.4% and 78.3% according to modified RECIST, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab might have potential therapeutic safety and efficacy in patients with advanced HCC, including those with disease refractory to lenvatinib. Further studies are needed to confirm the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib failure.