Curriculum Vitaes

Takeshi SAKURADA

  (櫻田 武)

Profile Information

Affiliation
Professor, Faculty of Science and Technology Department of Science and Technology , Seikei University
Degree
博士(工学)(東京工業大学)

J-GLOBAL ID
201101046932526723
researchmap Member ID
B000004170

Research History

 10

Papers

 26
  • Masayuki Tetsuka, Takeshi Sakurada, Mayuko Matsumoto, Takeshi Nakajima, Mitsuya Morita, Shigeru Fujimoto, Kensuke Kawai
    Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 17 1130272-1130272, 2023  Peer-reviewedCorresponding author
    This study aimed to clarify whether short-term neurofeedback training during the acute stroke phase led to prefrontal activity self-regulation, providing positive efficacy to working memory. A total of 30 patients with acute stroke performed functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback training for a day to increase their prefrontal activity. A randomized, Sham-controlled, double-blind study protocol was used comparing working memory ability before and after neurofeedback training. Working memory was evaluated using a target-searching task requiring spatial information retention. A decline in spatial working memory performance post-intervention was prevented in patients who displayed a higher task-related right prefrontal activity during neurofeedback training compared with the baseline. Neurofeedback training efficacy was not associated with the patient's clinical background such as Fugl-Meyer Assessment score and time since stroke. These findings demonstrated that even short-term neurofeedback training can strengthen prefrontal activity and help maintain cognitive ability in acute stroke patients, at least immediately after training. However, further studies investigating the influence of individual patient clinical background, especially cognitive impairment, on neurofeedback training is needed. Current findings provide an encouraging option for clinicians to design neurorehabilitation programs, including neurofeedback protocols, for acute stroke patients.
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Ayaka Horiuchi, Takashi Komeda
    Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 34(4) 777-785, Aug 20, 2022  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Robot-assisted body movements are a useful approach for the rehabilitation of motor dysfunction. Various robots based on end-effector or exoskeleton type have been proposed. However, the effect of these robots on brain activity during assistive lower limb movements remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated brain activity results among robot-assisted passive movements, voluntary active movements, and kinesthetic motor imagery. We measured and compared the brain activities of 21 young, healthy individuals during three experimental conditions associated with lower limb movements (active, passive, and imagery conditions) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Our results showed that although different brain areas with significant activity were observed among the conditions, the temporal patterns of the activity in each recording channel and the spatial patterns of functional connectivity showed high similarity between robot-assisted passive movements and voluntary active movements. Conversely, the robot-assisted passive movements did not show any similarity to motor imagery. Overall, these findings suggest that the robotic assistive approach is useful for activating not only afferent processes associated with sensory feedback processing but also motor control-related efferent processes.
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Mayuko Matsumoto, Shin-ichiroh Yamamoto
    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16(774475), Feb, 2022  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Neurofeedback is a neuromodulation technique used to improve brain function by self-regulating brain activity. However, the efficacy of neurofeedback training varies widely between individuals, and some participants fail to self-regulate brain activity. To overcome intersubject variation in neurofeedback training efficacy, it is critical to identify the factors that influence this type of neuromodulation. In this study, we considered that individual differences in cognitive ability may influence neurofeedback training efficacy and aimed to clarify the effect of individual working memory (WM) abilities, as characterized by sensory modality dominance, on neurofeedback training efficacy in healthy young adults. In particular, we focused on the abilities of individuals to retain internal (tactile or somatosensory) or external (visual) body information in their WM. Forty participants performed functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback training aimed at producing efficient and lower-level activity in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and frontopolar cortex. We carried out a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study that compared WM ability before and after neurofeedback training. Individual WM ability was quantified using a target searching task that required the participants to retain spatial information presented as vibrotactile or visual stimuli. Participants who received feedback information based on their own prefrontal activity showed gradually decreasing activity in the right prefrontal area during the neurofeedback training and demonstrated superior WM ability during the target searching task with vibrotactile stimuli compared with the participants who performed dummy neurofeedback training. In comparison, left prefrontal activity was not influenced by the neurofeedback training. Furthermore, the efficacy of neurofeedback training (i.e., lower right prefrontal activity and better searching task performance) was higher in participants who exhibited tactile dominance rather than visual dominance in their WM. These findings indicate that sensory modality dominance in WM may be an influential neurophysiological factor in determining the efficacy of neurofeedback training. These results may be useful in the development of neurofeedback training protocols tailored to individual needs.
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Masataka Yoshida, Kiyoshi Nagai
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15(784292), Jan, 2022  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Focus of attention is one of the most influential factors facilitating motor performance. Previous evidence supports that the external focus (EF) strategy, which directs attention to movement outcomes, is associated with better motor performance than the internal focus (IF) strategy, which directs attention to body movements. However, recent studies have reported that the EF strategy is not effective for some individuals. Furthermore, neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that the frontal and parietal areas characterize individual optimal attentional strategies for motor tasks. However, whether the sensory cortices are also functionally related to individual optimal attentional strategy remains unclear. Therefore, the present study examined whether an individual’s sensory processing ability would reflect the optimal attentional strategy. To address this point, we explored the relationship between responses in the early sensory cortex and individuals’ optimal attentional strategy by recording steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEP) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP). Twenty-six healthy young participants first performed a motor learning task with reaching movements under IF and EF conditions. Of the total sample, 12 individuals showed higher after-effects under the IF condition than the EF condition (IF-dominant group), whereas the remaining individuals showed the opposite trend (EF-dominant group). Subsequently, we measured SSSEP from bilateral primary somatosensory cortices while presenting vibrotactile stimuli and measured SSVEP from bilateral primary visual cortices while presenting checkerboard visual stimuli. The degree of increasing SSSEP response when the individuals in the IF-dominant group directed attention to vibrotactile stimuli was significantly more potent than those in the EF-dominant individuals. By contrast, the individuals in the EF-dominant group showed a significantly larger SSVEP increase while they directed attention to visual stimuli compared with the IF-dominant individuals. Furthermore, a significant correlation was observed such that individuals with more robust IF dominance showed more pronounced SSSEP attention modulation. These results suggest that the early sensory areas have crucial brain dynamics to characterize an individual’s optimal attentional strategy during motor tasks. The response characteristics may reflect the individual sensory processing ability, such as control of priority to the sensory inputs. Considering individual cognitive traits based on the suitable attentional strategy could enhance adaptability in motor tasks.
  • Masahiro Hirai, Takeshi Sakurada, Takahiro Ikeda, Yukifumi Monden, Hideo Shimoizumi, Takanori Yamagata
    Developmental Psychobiology, 64(1) e22229, Jan, 2022  Peer-reviewed
    The ability to understand the way other people see the world differs from one's own viewpoint is referred to as ''visual perspective-taking'' (VPT). Previous studies have demonstrated the behavioral performance in level 2 VPT (VPT2), the ability to understand that two different observers can have unique visual experiences of the same scene or object depending on the observers' physical location, changes during childhood. However, the developmental aspects underlying the neural mechanisms of VPT2 remains unknown. We measured the hemodynamic responses to a VPT2 task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, with mental rotation (MR) as a control task in 7- to 11-year-old and 11- to 16-year-old groups. In the VPT2 task, participants were required to mentally compute the perspective of a toy on the turntable from that of a doll placed in a different location from the observer. For the MR task, participants reported their perspectives after the toy was rotated. We found significantly higher oxy-hemoglobin changes during the VPT2 task than the MR task in the 7- to 11-year-old group but not in the 11- to 16-year-old group, in the right middle and superior temporal, angular gyrus and frontal regions. These findings highlight the important role of the right temporoparietal region in processing perspective, up to 11 years.
  • Masahiro Hirai, Takeshi Sakurada, Jun Izawa, Takahiro Ikeda, Yukifumi Monden, Hideo Shimoizumi, Takanori Yamagata
    Scientific Reports, 11(1), Dec, 2021  Peer-reviewed
  • Kiyoshi Nagai, Kairi Nishimura, Takeshi Sakurada, Hiroki Dobashi, Tsuneo Yoshikawa
    Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 39(7) 645-652, Sep, 2021  Peer-reviewed
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Kenji Kansaku
    European Journal of Neuroscience, Mar, 2021  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Inter-limb coordination is achieved through multiple levels of motor control based on intrinsic-muscle and extrinsic-visual coordinates. Online visual feedback affects which of these coordinates is dominant, and visual perception is involved in the switching of motor coordination across the two hands; however, it remains unclear whether there is any role for attention in inter-limb coordination. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of attention on the dominance of intrinsic-muscle and extrinsic-visual coordinates by investigating inter-limb interference in the right or left hand during bimanual reaching movements, as induced by visual perturbations. We first showed an effect of differences in online visual feedback on bimanual coordination (Experiment 1). We then revealed that attention to visual cursors that directly affected the hand movement led to dominance of the intrinsic-muscle coordinates, which synchronized homologous muscle activities. In contrast, attention to an integrated visual object controlled by bilateral hand movements was associated with a preference for extrinsic-visual coordinates to synchronize bilateral movement directions (Experiment 2). Thus, attention-dependent switching between intrinsic-muscle and extrinsic-visual coordinates was observed during bimanual movements; extrinsic-visual coordinates may enable goal-directed bimanual movements at least for particular task requirements.
  • Naoko Sakabe, Samirah Altukhaim, Yoshikatsu Hayashi, Takeshi Sakurada, Shiro Yano, Toshiyuki Kondo
    Frontiers in human neuroscience, 15 677578-677578, Jan, 2021  Peer-reviewed
    The long-term effects of impairment have a negative impact on the quality of life of stroke patients in terms of not using the affected limb even after some recovery (i.e., learned non-use). Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has been introduced as a new approach for the treatment of stroke rehabilitation. We propose an IVR-based therapeutic approach to incorporate positive reinforcement components in motor coordination as opposed to constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This study aimed to investigate the effect of IVR-reinforced physical therapy that incorporates positive reinforcement components in motor coordination. To simulate affected upper limb function loss in patients, a wrist weight was attached to the dominant hand of participant. Participants were asked to choose their right or left hand to reach toward a randomly allocated target. The movement of the virtual image of the upper limb was reinforced by visual feedback to participants, that is, the participants perceived their motor coordination as if their upper limb was moving to a greater degree than what was occurring in everyday life. We found that the use of the simulated affected limb was increased after the visual feedback enhancement intervention, and importantly, the effect was maintained even after gradual withdrawal of the visual amplification. The results suggest that positive reinforcement within the IVR could induce an effect on decision making in hand usage.
  • Mayuko Matsumoto, Takeshi Sakurada, Shin-ichiroh Yamamoto
    PLOS ONE, 15(8) e0238235-e0238235, Aug, 2020  Peer-reviewedCorresponding author
  • Ken Takiyama, Takeshi Sakurada, Masahiro Shinya, Takaaki Sato, Hirofumi Ogihara, Taiki Komatsu
    Scientific reports, 10(1) 7113-7113, Apr 28, 2020  Peer-reviewed
    Generating appropriate motor commands is an essential brain function. To achieve proper motor control in diverse situations, predicting future states of the environment and body and modifying the prediction are indispensable. The internal model is a promising hypothesis about brain function for generating and modifying the prediction. Although several findings support the involvement of the cerebellum in the internal model, recent results support the influence of other related brain regions on the internal model. A representative example is the motor adaptation ability in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Although this ability provides some hints about how dopamine deficits and other PD symptoms affect the internal model, previous findings are inconsistent; some reported a deficit in the motor adaptation ability in PD patients, but others reported that the motor adaptation ability of PD patients is comparable to that of healthy controls. A possible factor causing this inconsistency is the difference in task settings, resulting in  different cognitive strategies in each study. Here, we demonstrate a larger, but not better, motor adaptation ability in PD patients than in healthy controls while reducing the involvement of cognitive strategies and concentrating on implicit motor adaptation abilities. This study utilizes a smart-device-based experiment that enables motor adaptation experiments anytime and anywhere with less cognitive strategy involvement. The PD patients showed a significant response to insensible environmental changes, but the response was not necessarily suitable for adapting to the changes. Our findings support compensatory cerebellar functions in PD patients from the perspective of motor adaptation.
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Aya Goto, Masayuki Tetsuka, Takeshi Nakajima, Mitsuya Morita, Shin-Ichiroh Yamamoto, Masahiro Hirai, Kensuke Kawai
    Neurophotonics, 6(2) 025012-025012, Apr, 2019  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Directing attention to movement outcomes (external focus; EF), not body movements (internal focus; IF), is a better cognitive strategy for motor performance. However, EF is not effective in some healthy individuals or stroke patients. We aimed to identify the neurological basis reflecting the individual optimal attentional strategy using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Sixty-four participants (23 healthy young, 23 healthy elderly, and 18 acute stroke) performed a reaching movement task under IF and EF conditions. Of these, 13 healthy young participants, 11 healthy elderly participants, and 6 stroke patients showed better motor performance under EF conditions (EF-dominant), whereas the others showed IF-dominance. We then measured prefrontal activity during rhythmic hand movements under both attentional conditions. IF-dominant participants showed significantly higher left prefrontal activity than EF-dominant participants under IF condition. In addition, receiver operating characteristic analysis supported that the higher activity in the left frontopolar and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices could detect IF-dominance as an individual's optimal attentional strategy for preventing motor performance decline. Taken together, these results suggest that prefrontal activity during motor tasks reflects an individual's ability to process internal body information, thereby conferring IF-dominance. These findings could be applied for the development of individually optimized rehabilitation programs.
  • Masahiro Hirai, Takeshi Sakurada, Shin-ichi Muramatsu
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(2) 170-178, Feb, 2019  Peer-reviewedInvited
  • Takeshi SAKURADA, Masahiro HIRAI, Eiju WATANABE
    Brain and Behavior, e01183, Dec, 2018  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Takahiro IKEDA, Masahiro HIRAI, Takeshi SAKURADA, Yukifumi MONDEN, Tatsuya TOKUDA, Masako NAGASHIMA, Hideo SHIMOIZUMI, Ippeita DAN, Takanori YAMAGATA
    Neurophotonics, 5(3) 035008, Sep, 2018  Peer-reviewed
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Guenther Knoblich, Natalie Sebanz, Shin-ichi Muramatsu, Masahiro Hirai
    Neuropsychologia, 111 201-208, Mar 1, 2018  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Takeshi Nakajima, Mitsuya Morita, Masahiro Hirai, Eiju Watanabe
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 7(40592), Jan, 2017  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Toshihiro KAWASE, Takeshi SAKURADA, Yasuharu KOIKE, Kenji KANSAKU
    Journal of Neural Engineering, 14(1) 016015, Jan, 2017  Peer-reviewed
  • 櫻田武, 後藤彩, 中嶋剛, 森田光哉, 平井真洋, 山本紳一郎, 渡辺英寿, 川合謙介
    機能的脳神経外科, 56 62-67, 2017  InvitedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Masahiro Hirai, Eiju Watanabe
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 234(1) 301-311, Jan, 2016  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Koji Ito, Hiroaki Gomi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 43(1) 120-130, Jan, 2016  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Toshihiro Kawase, Tomoaki Komatsu, Kenji Kansaku
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 126(10) 1972-1978, Oct, 2015  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Hiroaki Gomi, Takeshi Sakurada, Takao Fukui
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 8(77), Mar, 2014  Peer-reviewed
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Toshihiro Kawase, Kouji Takano, Tomoaki Komatsu, Kenji Kansaku
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 7(172), 2013  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Takeshi Sakurada, Hiroaki Gomi, Koji Ito
    2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 5922-+, 2009  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • SAKURADA Takeshi, GOMI Hiroaki, ITO Koji
    The IEICE transactions on information and systems, J91-D(9) 2382-2393, Sep, 2008  Peer-reviewedLead author

Misc.

 107

Books and Other Publications

 2

Presentations

 11

Research Projects

 22