Curriculum Vitaes

Kosei Sato

  (佐藤 耕世)

Profile Information

Affiliation
Senior Researcher, Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)
Visiting Associate Professor, Graduate School of Life Science, University of Hyogo
Degree
Ph.D(Mar, 2007, Tohoku University)

Researcher number
40451611
ORCID ID
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-1440
J-GLOBAL ID
201601010075503678
Researcher ID
V-8303-2018
researchmap Member ID
7000017753

External link

KS is a neurogeneticist in Japan. KS uses the fruit fly as a model organism to dissect how innate behaviors are built into the nervous system during development.


Papers

 27
  • Ryoya Tanaka, Yusuke Hara, Kosei Sato, Soh Kohatsu, Hinata Murakami, Tomohiro Higuchi, Takeshi Awasaki, Shu Kondo, Atsushi Toyoda, Azusa Kamikouchi, Daisuke Yamamoto
    Science, 389(6761) 747-752, Aug 14, 2025  Peer-reviewed
    In accepting a courting male, Drosophila subobscura females require nuptial gift giving in which a male gives regurgitated crop contents to her mouth to mouth. No similar behavior is found in D. melanogaster . By clonal activation of neurons expressing the male-determinant FruM, we identified insulin-like peptide–producing cells (IPCs) and their putative postsynaptic targets, proboscis-innervating motoneurons, as those critical for gift giving. We demonstrate that loss of FruM from D. subobscura IPCs abrogates neurite extension and gift giving, whereas FruM overexpression in their D. melanogaster counterparts induces overgrowth of neurites that harbor functional synapses, culminating in increased regurgitation. We suggest that the acquisition of FruM expression by IPCs was a key event occurring in an ancestral D. subobscura that conferred a latent capability to perform nuptial gift giving.
  • Sato K, Yamamoto D
    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 16(128437), Oct, 2023  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    Gene Expression Patterns, 43 119232-119232, Mar, 2022  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Han-qing Liang, Toru Katoh, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto, Shuo-yang Wen
    Scientific Reports, 11(1) 15272, Jul, 2021  Peer-reviewed
    <title>Abstract</title>While epigamic traits likely evolve via sexual selection, the mechanism whereby internal sexual dimorphism arises remains less well understood. Seeking clues as to how the internal sexual dimorphism evolved, we compared the abdominal musculature of 41 <italic>Drosophila montium</italic> group species, to determine whether any of these species carry a male-specific muscle of Lawrence (MOL). Our quantitative analysis revealed that the size of a sexually dimorphic MOL analog found in 19 <italic>montium</italic> group species varied widely from species to species, suggesting the gradual evolution of this sexually dimorphic neuromuscular trait. We attempted the ancestral state reconstitution for the presence or absence of the neuromuscular sexual dimorphism in the A5 segment; the neuromuscular sexual dimorphism existed in an old ancestor of the <italic>montium</italic> group, which was lost in some of the most recent common ancestors of derived lineages, and subsequently some species regained it. This loss-and-gain history was not shared by evolutionary changes in the courtship song pattern, even though both traits were commonly regulated by the master regulator male-determinant protein FruM. It is envisaged that different sets of FruM target genes may serve for shaping the song and MOL characteristics, respectively, and, as a consequence, each phenotypic trait underwent a distinct evolutionary path.
  • Kosei Sato
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14 597428, Dec 4, 2020  Peer-reviewedLead author
    The main theme of the review is how changes in pheromone biochemistry and the sensory circuits underlying pheromone detection contribute to mate choice and reproductive isolation. The review focuses primarily on gustatory and non-volatile signals in Drosophila. Premating isolation is prevalent among closely related species. In Drosophila, preference for conspecifics against other species in mate choice underlies premating isolation, and such preference relies on contact chemosensory communications between a female and male along with other biological factors. For example, although D. simulans and D. melanogaster are sibling species that yield hybrids, their premating isolation is maintained primarily by the contrasting effects of 7,11-heptacosadiene (7,11-HD), a predominant female pheromone in D. melanogaster, on males of the two species: it attracts D. melanogaster males and repels D. simulans males. The contrasting preference for 7,11-HD in males of these two species is mainly ascribed to opposite effects of 7,11-HD on neural activities in the courtship decision-making neurons in the male brain: 7,11-HD provokes both excitatory and inhibitory inputs in these neurons and differences in the balance between the two counteracting inputs result in the contrasting preference for 7,11-HD, i.e., attraction in D. melanogaster and repulsion in D. simulans. Introduction of two double bonds is a key step in 7,11-HD biosynthesis and is mediated by the desaturase desatF, which is active in D. melanogaster females but transcriptionally inactivated in D. simulans females. Thus, 7,11-HD biosynthesis diversified in females and 7,11-HD perception diversified in males, yet it remains elusive how concordance of the changes in the two sexes was attained in evolution.
  • Kosei Sato, Hiroki Ito, Daisuke Yamamoto
    Communications Biology, 3(1) 598, Oct 21, 2020  Peer-reviewedLead author
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This study aims at identifying transcriptional targets of FruitlessBM (FruBM), which represents the major isoform of male-specific FruM transcription factors that induce neural sexual dimorphisms. A promoter of the axon-guidance factor gene <jats:italic>robo1</jats:italic> carries the 16-bp palindrome motif Pal1, to which FruM binds. Our genome-wide search for Pal1-homologous sequences yielded ~200 candidate genes. Among these, CG17716 potentially encodes a transmembrane protein with extracellular immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains similar to Robo1. Indeed, FruBM overexpression reduced CG17716 mRNA and protein expression. In the <jats:italic>fru</jats:italic>-expressing mAL neuron cluster exhibiting sexual dimorphism, we found that CG17716 knockdown in female neurons completely transformed all neurites to the male-type. Conversely, CG17716 overexpression suppressed male-specific midline crossing of <jats:italic>fru</jats:italic>-expressing sensory axons. We renamed CG17716 <jats:italic>teiresias</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>tei</jats:italic>) based on this feminizing function. We hypothesize that Tei interacts with other Ig superfamily transmembrane proteins, including Robo1, to feminize the neurite patterns in females, whereas FruBM represses <jats:italic>tei</jats:italic> transcription in males.</jats:p>
  • Sato K, Tanaka R, Ishikawa Y, Yamamoto D
    Genes, 11(2)(157) 157-157, Feb, 2020  Peer-reviewedLead author
    Behavior is a readout of neural function. Therefore, any difference in behavior among different species is, in theory, an outcome of interspecies diversification in the structure and/or function of the nervous system. However, the neural diversity underlying the species-specificity in behavioral traits and its genetic basis have been poorly understood. In this article, we discuss potential neural substrates for species differences in the courtship pulse song frequency and mating partner choice in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. We also discuss possible neurogenetic mechanisms whereby a novel behavioral repertoire emerges based on the study of nuptial gift transfer, a trait unique to D. subobscura in the genus Drosophila. We found that the conserved central circuit composed primarily of fruitless-expressing neurons (the fru-circuit) serves for the execution of courtship behavior, whereas the sensory pathways impinging onto the fru-circuit or the motor pathways downstream of the fru-circuit are susceptible to changes associated with behavioral species differences.
  • Kosei Sato
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(245), Oct 18, 2019  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Kosei Sato
    Genes, Brain and Behavior, e12606, Sep 5, 2019  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Sato K§, Ahsan MT§, Ote M, Koganezawa M, Yamamoto D (§ co-first authors)
    PLOS Genetics, 15(7) e1008309(7) e1008309, Jul, 2019  Peer-reviewedLead author
    Males of the Drosophila melanogaster mutant croaker (cro) generate a polycyclic pulse song dissimilar to the monocyclic songs typical of wild-type males during courtship. However, cro has not been molecularly mapped to any gene in the genome. We demonstrate that cro is a mutation in the gene encoding the Calmodulin-binding transcription factor (Camta) by genetic complementation tests with chromosomal deficiencies, molecular cloning of genomic fragments that flank the cro-mutagenic P-insertion, and phenotypic rescue of the cro mutant phenotype by Camta+-encoding cDNA as well as a BAC clone containing the gene for Camta. We further show that knockdown of the Camta-encoding gene phenocopies cro mutant songs when targeted to a subset of fruitless-positive neurons that include the mcALa and AL1 clusters in the brain. cro-GAL4 and an anti-Camta antibody labeled a large number of brain neurons including mcALa. We conclude that the Camta-encoding gene represents the cro locus, which has been implicated in a species-specific difference in courtship songs between D. sechellia and simulans.
  • Sato K, Ito H, Yokoyama A, Toba G, Yamamoto D
    Nature communications, 10(166), Jan, 2019  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
  • Binglong Zhang, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    Biology Open, 7(2), 2018  Peer-reviewed
  • Ryoya Tanaka, Tomohiro Higuchi, Soh Kohatsu, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 37(48) 11662-11674, Nov, 2017  Peer-reviewed
  • Zahid Sadek Chowdhury, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 8(1), Nov, 2017  Peer-reviewed
  • Yasemin B. Yilmazer, Masayuki Koganezawa, Kosei Sato, Jinhua Xu, Daisuke Yamamoto
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 7, Dec, 2016  Peer-reviewed
  • Hiroki Ito, Kosei Sato, Shu Kondo, Ryu Ueda, Daisuke Yamamoto
    Current biology : CB, 26(12) 1532-1542, Jun 20, 2016  Peer-reviewed
  • Takaaki Goto, Kosei Sato, Hiroyuki Sone, Masayuki Koganezawa, Hiroki Ito, Daisuke Yamamoto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 29(4) 169-173, Oct, 2015  Peer-reviewed
  • Shingo Kimura, Yasufumi Sakakibara, Kosei Sato, Manabu Ote, Hiroki Ito, Masayuki Koganezawa, Daisuke Yamamoto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 29(1) 8-17, Mar, 2015  Peer-reviewed
  • Sakino Takayanagi, Gakuta Toba, Tamas Lukacsovich, Manabu Ote, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 29(1) 23-29, Mar, 2015  Peer-reviewed
  • Daisuke Yamamoto, Kosei Sato, Masayuki Koganezawa
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 200(4) 251-264, Apr, 2014  
  • Sato, K., Yamamoto, D.
    Advances in Genetics, 86 46-63, 2014  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Hiroki Ito, Kosei Sato, Daisuke Yamamoto
    FLY, 7(2) 87-91, Apr, 2013  
  • Hiroki Ito, Kosei Sato, Masayuki Koganezawa, Manabu Ote, Ken Matsumoto, Chihiro Hama, Daisuke Yamamoto
    CELL, 149(6) 1327-1338, Jun, 2012  Peer-reviewed
  • Kosei Sato, Ryohei Seki, Miyuki Noro, Hitoshi Yokoyama, Koji Tamura
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART B-MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL EVOLUTION, 314B(7) 539-551, Nov, 2010  Peer-reviewed
  • Kosei Sato, Yutaka Koizumi, Masanori Takahashi, Atsushi Kuroiwa, Koji Tamura
    DEVELOPMENT, 134(7) 1397-1406, Apr, 2007  Peer-reviewed
  • Kosei Sato
    Experimental Medicine, Youdo-sha, 23(1); 87-93, Dec 20, 2004  

Misc.

 8

Presentations

 89

Teaching Experience

 5

Professional Memberships

 2

Research Projects

 12

Industrial Property Rights

 1

Social Activities

 14