Takeshi Yoshikawa

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare coronary arterial stenosis evaluations by hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR), model-based IR (MBIR), deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and high-resolution deep learning reconstruction (HR-DLR) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in both in vitro and in vivo studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the in vitro study, a total of three-vessel tube phantoms with diameters of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm and with simulated non-calcified stepped stenosis plaques with degrees of 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% stenosis were scanned with area-detector CT (ADCT) and ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT). Then, ADCT data were reconstructed using all methods, although UHR-CT data were reconstructed with hybrid-type IR, MBIR, and DLR. For the in vivo study, patients who had undergone CCTA at ADCT were retrospectively selected, and each CCTA data set was reconstructed with all methods. To compare the image noise and measurement accuracy at each of the stenosis levels, image noise, and inner diameter were evaluated and statistically compared. To determine the effect of HR-DLR on CAD-RADS evaluation accuracy, the accuracy of CAD-RADS categorization of all CCTAs was compared by using McNemar's test. RESULTS: The image noise of HR-DLR was significantly lower than that of others on ADCT and UHR-CT (p < 0.0001). At a 50% and 75% stenosis level for each phantom, hybrid-type IR showed a significantly larger mean difference on ADCT than did others (p < 0.05). At in vivo study, 31 patients were included. Accuracy on HR-DLR was significantly higher than that on hybrid-type IR, MBIR, or DLR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: HR-DLR is potentially superior for coronary arterial stenosis evaluations to hybrid-type IR, MBIR, or DLR shown on CCTA. KEY POINTS: Question How do coronary arterial stenosis evaluations by hybrid-type IR, MBIR, DLR, and HR-DLR compare to coronary CT angiography? Findings HR-DLR showed significantly lower image noise and more accurate coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) evaluation than others. Clinical relevance HR-DLR is potentially superior to other reconstruction methods for coronary arterial stenosis evaluations, as demonstrated by coronary CT angiography results on ADCT and as shown in both in vitro and in vivo studies.

PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been recommended as useful for improving image quality. Moreover, compressed sensing (CS) or DLR has been proposed as useful for improving temporal resolution and image quality on MR sequences in different body fields. However, there have been no reports regarding the utility of DLR for image quality and T-factor assessment improvements on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), short inversion time (TI) inversion recovery (STIR) imaging, and unenhanced- and contrast-enhanced (CE) 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (GRE) imaging with and without CS in comparison with thin-section multidetector-row CT (MDCT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of DLR for improving image quality and the appropriate sequence for T-category assessment for NSCLC patients. METHODS: As subjects for this study, 213 pathologically diagnosed NSCLC patients who underwent thin-section MDCT and MR imaging as well as T-factor diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled. SNR of each tumor was calculated and compared by paired t-test for each sequence with and without DLR. T-factor for each patient was assessed with thin-section MDCT and all MR sequences, and the accuracy for T-factor diagnosis was compared among all sequences and thin-section CT by means of McNemar's test. RESULTS: SNRs of T2WI, STIR imaging, unenhanced thin-section Quick 3D imaging, and CE-thin-section Quick 3D imaging with DLR were significantly higher than SNRs of those without DLR (P < 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy of STIR imaging and CE-thick- or thin-section Quick 3D imaging was significantly higher than that of thin-section CT, T2WI, and unenhanced thick- or thin-section Quick 3D imaging (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLR is thus considered useful for image quality improvement on MR imaging. STIR imaging and CE-Quick 3D imaging with or without CS were validated as appropriate MR sequences for T-factor evaluation in NSCLC patients.

Many promising study results as well as technical advances for chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated its academic and clinical potentials during the last few decades, although chest MRI has been used for relatively few clinical situations in routine clinical practice. However, the Fleischner Society as well as the Japanese Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine have published a few white papers to promote chest MRI in routine clinical practice. In this review, we present clinical evidence of the efficacy of chest MRI for 1) thoracic oncology and 2) pulmonary vascular diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was thus to compare capabilities for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other of pulmonary MRIs with ultra-short TE (UTE) obtained with single- and dual-echo techniques (UTE-MRISingle and UTE-MRIDual) and thin-section CT for stage IA lung cancer patients. METHODS: Ninety pathologically diagnosed stage IA lung cancer patients who underwent thin-section standard-dose CT, UTE-MRISingle, and UTE-MRIDual, surgical treatment and pathological examinations were included in this retrospective study. The largest dimension (Dlong), solid portion (solid Dlong), and consolidation/tumor (C/T) ratio of each nodule were assessed. Two-tailed Student's t-tests were performed to compare all indexes obtained with each method between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-based positive tests were performed to determine all feasible threshold values for distinguishing non- or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from other lung cancers. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were then compared by means of McNemar's test. RESULTS: Each index showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Specificities and accuracies of solid Dlong for UTE-MRIDual2nd echo and CTMediastinal were significantly higher than those of solid Dlong for UTE-MRISingle and UTE-MRIDual1st echo and all C/T ratios except CTMediastinal (p < 0.05). Moreover, the specificities and accuracies of solid Dlong and C/T ratio were significantly higher than those of Dlong for each method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary MRI with UTE is considered at least as valuable as thin-section CT for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other stage IA lung cancers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Pulmonary MRI with UTE's capability for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other lung cancers in stage IA lung cancer patients is equal or superior to that of thin-section CT. KEY POINTS: • Correlations were excellent for pathologically examined nodules with the largest dimensions (Dlong) and a solid component (solid Dlong) for all indexes (0.95 ≤ r ≤ 0.99, p < 0.0001). • Pathologically examined Dlong and solid Dlong obtained with all methods showed significant differences between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers (p < 0.0001). • Solid tumor components are most accurately measured by UTE-MRIDual2nd echo and CTMediastinal, whereas the ground-glass component is imaged by UTE-MRIDual1st echo and CTlung with high accuracy. UTE-MRIDual predicts tumor invasiveness with 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity at a C/T threshold of 0.5.

PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced by major vendors, tested for CT examinations of a variety of organs, and compared with other reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of DLR for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation with those of hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR) for standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs (SDCT, RDCT and ULDCT) obtained with high-definition CT (HDCT) and reconstructed at 0.25-mm, 0.5-mm and 1-mm section thicknesses with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes for patients with various pulmonary diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty age-, gender- and body mass index-matched patients with various pulmonary diseases underwent SDCT (CT dose index volume <CTDIvol>: mean ± standard deviation, 9.0 ± 1.8 mGy), RDCT (CTDIvol: 1.7 ± 0.2 mGy) and ULDCT (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy) at a HDCT. All CT data set were then reconstructed with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes by means of hybrid-type IR and DLR. SNR of lung parenchyma and probabilities of all lung textures were assessed for each CT data set. SNR and detection performance of each lung texture reconstructed with DLR and hybrid-type IR were then compared by means of paired t tests and ROC analyses for all CT data at each section thickness. RESULTS: Data for each radiation dose showed DLR attained significantly higher SNR than hybrid-type IR for each of the CT data (p < 0.0001). On assessments of all findings except consolidation and nodules or masses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for ULDCT with hybrid-type IR for each section thickness (0.91 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.97) were significantly smaller than those with DLR (0.97 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05) and the standard protocol (0.98 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLR is potentially more effective for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation than hybrid-type IR on all radiation dose CTs obtained at HDCT and reconstructed with each section thickness with both matrixes for patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases.