宇宙科学広報・普及主幹付
基本情報
- 所属
- 国立研究開発法人宇宙航空研究開発機構 宇宙科学研究所 太陽系科学研究系 助教
- 学位
- 修士(理学)(東京大学)博士(理学)(東京大学)
- J-GLOBAL ID
- 201901006861784502
- researchmap会員ID
- B000359529
研究分野
1経歴
5-
2010年4月 - 現在
-
2007年9月 - 2010年3月
-
2007年4月 - 2007年8月
-
2006年4月 - 2007年3月
-
2003年4月 - 2006年3月
学歴
3-
2003年4月 - 2006年3月
-
2001年4月 - 2003年3月
-
- 2001年3月
委員歴
1-
2008年 - 2010年
論文
95-
Geophysical Research Letters 2026年2月16日
-
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 130(11) 2025年11月Abstract On 15 February 2018 a co‐rotating interaction region (CIR) from an equatorial coronal hole reached the Earth. The CIR initiated a moderate and slowly intensifying geomagnetic storm, which began with a large and strong substorm injection. The substorm injection was exceptionally well‐observed by an array of spacecraft including LANL‐GEO satellites, Van Allen Probes (RBSP), Arase (ERG), and MetOp/POES, as well as ground‐based instruments. These observations enable the unambiguous identification of several important features that have been impossible to measure directly in other events. The substorm injection extended well inside the geosynchronous orbit. A fortuitous conjunction of RBSP‐A (moving inbound) and Arase (simultaneously moving outbound at the same magnetic local time) allows us to establish, very precisely, the location of the inner edge of the injection region at L = 3.8−3.9. In supporting observations, North American riometers saw precipitation extending down to L ≈ 4 but not lower. Arase and RBSP‐A also observed whistler‐mode hiss waves inside the plasmasphere. Analysis of the resonance conditions shows, conclusively, and for the first time, that they were produced by the drifting injected electrons. RBSP‐A observations also show the injection (or transport) of electrons into or through the slot region within hours of the substorm injection onset. Previous studies were not able to clearly connect or separate substorm injections and slot‐filling processes. These new observations clearly identify slot‐filling as a spatially and temporally separate process that is not a direct result of substorm injection.
-
Annales Geophysicae 43(2) 561-578 2025年10月1日Abstract. In the polar middle and upper atmosphere, nitric oxide (NO) is produced in large amounts by both solar EUV and X-ray radiation and energetic particle precipitation, and its chemical loss is driven by photodissociation. As a result, polar atmospheric NO has a clear seasonal variability and a solar cycle dependency which have been measured by satellite-based instruments. On shorter timescales, NO response to magnetospheric electron precipitation has been shown to take place on a day-to-day basis. Despite recent studies using observations and simulations, it remains challenging to understand NO daily distribution in the mesosphere–lower thermosphere during geomagnetic storms and to separate contributions of electron forcing and atmospheric chemistry and dynamics. This is due to the uncertainties existing in the available electron flux observations, differences in representation of NO chemistry in models, and differences between NO observations from satellite instruments. In this paper, we use mesospheric–lower-thermospheric NO column density data measured with a millimeter-wave spectroscopic radiometer at the Syowa station in Antarctica. In the period 2012–2017, we study both the long-term and short-term variability of NO. Comparisons are made with results from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model to understand the shortcomings of current electron forcing in models and how the representation of the NO variability can be improved in simulations. We find that, qualitatively, the simulated year-to-year and day-to-day variability of NO is in agreement with the observations. On the other hand, there is up to a factor of 2 underestimation of the NO column density in wintertime. Also, the model captures only 27 % of the range of observed daily NO values. The observed day-to-day variability has a good correlation with three different geomagnetic indices, indicating the importance of electron forcing in atmospheric NO production. Using electron flux measurements from the Arase satellite, we demonstrate their potential in atmospheric research. Our results call for improved representation of electron forcing in simulations to capture the observed day-to-day variability.
-
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 130(10) 2025年10月Abstract Using Arase satellite observations, this study provides a comprehensive statistical analysis of ions (H+, He+, O+) and electron contributions to the total ring current pressure during storms with two different drivers. The results demonstrate the effect of different solar wind drivers on the composition, energy distribution, and spatial characteristics of the ring current. Using 32 CIR‐ and 30 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection (ICME)‐driven storms, we characterize the ring current pressure evolution during the prestorm, main, early‐recovery, and late‐recovery storm phases as a function of magnetic local time and L‐shell. In CIR‐driven storms, H+ ions are the dominant (∼70%) contributor to the total ring current pressure during main/early recovery phases and increasing to ∼80% during late recovery. In contrast, the O+ pressure (E = 20–50 keV) response is significantly stronger in ICME‐driven storms contributing ∼40% to the overall pressure during the main/early recovery phases and even dominate (∼53%) in certain MLT sectors. Additionally, ICME‐driven storms tend to have peak pressure at lower L‐shells (L ≈ 3–4), while CIR‐driven storms show pressure peaks at slightly higher L‐shells (L ≈ 4–5). Interestingly, electron pressure also plays a notable role in specific MLT sectors, contributing ∼18% (03–09 MLT) during the main phase of CIR‐driven storms and ∼11% (21–03 MLT) during ICME‐driven storms. The results highlight that the storm time electron pressure plays a crucial role in the ring current buildup. Another noteworthy feature of this study is that Arase's fine‐energy resolution and broad coverage enable a detailed investigation of energy‐dependent ring current dynamics.
MISC
144-
観測ロケットシンポジウム2022 講演集 = Proceedings of Sounding Rocket Symposium 2022 2023年3月第5回観測ロケットシンポジウム(2023年2月28日-3月1日. オンライン開催) 5th Sounding Rocket Symposium(February 28-March 1, 2023. Online Meeting) 著者人数: 15名 資料番号: SA6000185026 レポート番号: Ⅴ-1
所属学協会
5共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題
8-
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 2023年4月 - 2028年3月
-
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 基盤研究(B) 2020年4月 - 2023年3月
-
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 国際共同研究加速基金(国際共同研究強化(B)) 2018年10月 - 2021年3月
-
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 基盤研究(C) 2018年4月 - 2021年3月
-
日本学術振興会 科学研究費助成事業 2015年4月 - 2019年3月